I’ve stopped watching awards ceremony long back. Reason is simple and straight. The deserving actor never gets the trophy. I simply don’t understand the criteria on which these awards are given. I read the list of Nandi awards for 2005. It shocked me mildly.
Mahesh Babu got the best actor award. First question. Was his acting really worth the award? For me it was either Shashank or Siddardh. How can one ever sideline Siddardh’s amazing performance in Nuvvastanante Nenoddantana. Also Shashank was simply superb in Anukokunda Oka Roju. Strange are the decisions of the jury.
There is no second thinking about Mahesh’s performance. It was good. I repeat it was good. But definitely not great. Earlier he had won an award for Nizam. He deserved it very much, because his performance was exceptionally good. But Mahesh in Atadu was good, but definitely not a main contender for this award.
Trisha was awarded the best actress. Not happy with this too. Charmy was the rightful one. My reason being that Nuvvastanante Nenoddantana was Siddardh’s film. Trisha has nothing much to do post interval. Whereas AOR was all in all Charmy’s film. I had this feeling that to compensate Siddardh’s loss the award was given to Trisha as she was a part of Nuvvastanante Nenoddantana.
Whatever be the final verdict, let’s remember one thing jury could be judging under pressure, but the audiences aren’t. I really hope that these stars won’t get bogged down by the jury’s decision and will give us excellent films in coming years.
No comments:
Post a Comment